文章目录 (Archives) 新闻与文摘 (News) 搜索本站 (Search) 读书馆 (Press)

2008-1-19

非精英法学院要不要搞法律交叉学科研究?

圣约翰大学法学院 Brian Z. Tamanaha 教授在 Balkinization 写了一篇“Why the Interdisciplinary Movement in Legal Academia Might be a Bad Idea (For Most Law Schools)”,引起一些美国同行的热议:

1. Brian Leiter 收集的一些评论;

2. “Is Interdisciplinary Legal Study a Luxury?” by Dan Solove;

3. “Non-Elite Interdisiciplinary Scholars” by Ethan Leib;

4. “Tamanaha on Interdisciplinary Scholarship” by Belle Lettre;

5. “Interdisciplinarity, Multidisciplinarity, and the Future of the Legal Academy” by Lawrence B. Solum;

6. “Law schools, scholarship, and lawyer licensing” by Larry Ribstein;

7. “Is There an Impending Crisis in Non-Elite Law Schools?” by Brian Tamanaha;

8. “Encore - I Couldn’t Resist Saying Something About the Interdisciplinarity Debate” by Jeffrey Lipshaw;

9. “Aesop’s Bat and Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship” by Mark Graber;

10. “Interdisciplinary legal education: the overt costs” by Jim Chen;

11. “On the Impact of Blogging and Legal Scholarship” by Jim Milles.

注:以上部分链接在河蟹社会需要穿墙才能访问;请自觉使用穿墙术。

1 条评论

    可谓功利,也可谓实在。

    Comment No. 1 by milk @ 2008-1-26 11:44

    以上评论内容仅代表评论者个人意见,不代表本站或任何其他人立场。本站保留删除与正文无关评论或人身攻击等不适当言论的权力。读者申请删除不适当留言请电邮联系本站管理员。

    Announcement by 智识@IdeoBook™ 管理员

发表评论
(required)
(required) (will not be published)

Allowed HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>